InVisee isn’t a single piece of software. It’s a set of questions that should be answerable before anyone’s identity is used — and a discipline for keeping the answers on record.
Every legitimate use of a person’s identity rests on a chain of plain questions. Who is this, actually? Who has the right to decide on their behalf? What, specifically, was agreed to? And if someone asks later, can that be shown? Most disputes and most misuse happen because one of those questions was never answered clearly in the first place. InVisee is built around answering them properly, in order, every time.
In this early stage, this takes a deliberately simple, largely manual form. A small number of people we know directly are registering an InVisee Identity Record — a dated, evidenced record built around a cryptographic hash of their reference material, not the material itself by default. It records that something existed, when, and under whose authority — nothing more. It does not create, transfer or determine any legal right on its own.
License first, litigate last.
Where InVisee can help someone use an identity properly instead of guessing, that’s the outcome we look for first. Enforcement has its place, but it’s not the product, and it’s not how we’d like to introduce ourselves.